New Lens

Discuss cameras, settings, composition, software, and anything related to photography as it pertains to our plants, gardens, and landscapes.
Post Reply
User avatar
Gee.S
Site Admin
Posts: 9908
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 1:42 pm
Location: Fountain Hills, AZ
USDA Zone: 9b
Contact:

New Lens

#1

Post by Gee.S »

I just received a new lens I ordered, and I am anxious to play. It's a Sigma 18-250mm f3.5, and it cost about ½ as much as my primary. It isn't intended to replace my primary, but serve as my new zoom. I travel with two camera bodies, one as my primary and the other a 75-300 f4.6 zoom to shake out stuff too far away. Unfortunately, it's a cheap lens, and not only takes crappy pictures, it is impossible to hold steady while fully extended, requiring a monopod.

The new lens is smaller and easier to hold steady. It also features "Optical Stabilizer", which it claims "is possible to get sharp results at shutter speeds approximately 4 steps slower than you could without...". It should really help eliminate camera shake with the lens fully extended.

Here is a shot from my front yard with the lens fully extended. Not bad. I assume that on objects further away, I'll get better results in regard to getting more of the plant in focus. I generally don't care how sharply focused a couple of leaves in the foreground are, I want the whole plant in focus, even groups of plants -- and that is why I gravitate toward fast lenses. My fastest is a fixed f1.4, and I will take it out along with my new lens once this crappy CA weather clears out. It's playtime! :))
Playing 006.JPG
Playing 006.JPG (81.17 KiB) Viewed 5193 times
Agave
"American aloe plant," 1797, from Greek Agaue, proper name in mythology (mother of Pentheus), from agauos "noble," perhaps from agasthai "wonder at".

"Some talk the talk, others walk the walk, but I stalk the stalk"
KLC
Ready to Bolt
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 9:30 am
Location: Phoenix, Az.

Re: New Lens

#2

Post by KLC »

Nice GeeS.

I got myself a couple of lenses too. I bought the Nikkor 18-200 F3.5-5.6, and a Nikkor 35mm f1.8. Have to wait until Tuesday though.

The prime 50mm was not exactly what I wanted for a fixed lens so I got the 35 instead. The f1.4 would have been nice but twice the money.

When the smoke clears, I want to get a dedicated prime macro in the 200mm range. I'm interested in the small things haha.

A second camera body is a great idea.
Don't California my Arizona!
sarahplanter
Rhizome
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2024 11:37 pm

Re: New Lens

#3

Post by sarahplanter »

Congrats on the new lens, Gee! The Sigma will be a great travel lens and nice upgrade from your 75-300. The optical stabilization should definitely come in handy. Can't wait to see some photos once you get to test it out more - have fun playing with your new toy!
User avatar
mickthecactus
Moderator
Posts: 3029
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 5:36 am
Location: Hertfordshire UK.

Re: New Lens

#4

Post by mickthecactus »

He’s had it for 10 years.....
User avatar
coz
Bulbil
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:06 am
Location: Australia, Victoria
USDA Zone: 9

Re: New Lens

#5

Post by coz »

For many years weight and camera shake was a factor and still is. The Canon efs 24mm f 2.8 stm, has no image stabilization, which I find is not needed, it is lite and does not leave my camera much. I am very happy with this lens, also the price and wish I had purchased sooner.
Post Reply